First new C-17 lands at Air Force Base
War workhorse to be put to work almost immediately
The Post and Courier
Wednesday, November 19, 2008
That new aircraft smell — it's what the newer pilots, crew and support crews have been waiting for at Charleston Air Force Base.
Tyrone Walker The Post and Courier
A crowd of airmen and distinguished civilian guests gathers in the bay of the Charleston Air Force Base's newest C-17 aircraft, which landed in North Charleston on Tuesday.
On Tuesday, they brought it home. The first C-17 Globemaster III to arrive in five years pulled up to the applause of a hangar full of military and civilian notables. It's the first of 10 new cargo jets the Air Force is in line to get, each at a cost of more than $202 million. It didn't come a moment too soon. The C-17 has been the workhorse of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, so much so that the 50 planes already flying out of Charleston have seen their 30-year lifespan reduced to about 23 years. The C-17s also have flown humanitarian missions around the world. In 2007 alone, the planes flew 18,000 missions, moving 2.6 million pounds of cargo and 142,000 people.
By the numbers
C-17 Globemaster III
DIMENSIONS: Wingspan, 170 feet; length, 174 feet; height, 55 feet.
SPEED: 518 mph at 28,000 feet.
CAPACITY: 102 troops, 36 litter and 54 ambulatory patients and attendants or 170,900 pounds of cargo.
RANGE: Worldwide with in-flight re-fueling.
ENGINES AND THRUST: Four Pratt & Whitney F117-PW-100 turbofan engines; 40,440 pounds thrust per engine.
Charleston Air Base in '07
MISSIONS: 18,000.
CARGO MOVED: 2.6 million pounds.
PEOPLE MOVED: 142,000.
The planes and their crews "are delivering hope, providing freedom and taking the nation's fight to our enemies," Col. John "Red" Millander, 437th Airlift Wing commander, told the hangar audience in a brief ceremonial presentation of the aircraft's keys after the landing. This plane and the nine to follow have technology and capabilities that didn't exist when the first C-17 landed in Charleston 15 years ago, he said. In an interview later, Millander talked about touches such as secure satellite communications worldwide and night-vision goggles that allow not only flying but unloading and loading in the dark. The new plane is a morale boost, as well as eagerly awaited new equipment. The smell, by the way, isn't much different than a new car smell. "It's clean, and where we operate right now is dirty and dusty," said Lt. Col. Buddy Czuba, 14th Airlift Squadron commander, who has flown three formal deployments to the Mideast. The workload "has definitely taken a toll on the aircraft. It's great to have a new one show up here, no doubt." Millander said he expected to put the jet to use flying missions almost immediately, getting it in the air in a few days.
Tyrone Walker The Post and Courier
The first of 10 new C-17 Globemaster IIIs arrived Tuesday at the Charleston Air Force Base in North Charleston.
The C-17's first ride was a five-hour jaunt from Long Beach, Calif., through relatively calm skies. The pilot was Brig. Gen. Bradley R. Pray, deputy director of the Air Mobility Command's Air, Space and Information Operations and a former pilot of the C-130, the cargo jet before the C-17. He had never flown one before. It all wowed him — the sophisticated avionics that make a navigator unnecessary, the new-age electronics. But mostly he just loved the way it flew. "What a dream," he said.
Reach Bo Petersen at 745-5852 or bpetersen@postandcourier.com.
|
Posted by 5thGenerationLocal on November 19, 2008 at 8:07 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Can someone look into the numbers please? I know that 2.6 million pounds is not a lot considering that the plane is capable of carrying close to 100,000 pounds a pop.
Posted by mikell96 on November 19, 2008 at 9:41 a.m. (Suggest removal)
The article states "the C-130, the cargo jet before the C-17."
Did not the C-5 and C-141 come afer the C-130?
Posted by tgr83 on November 19, 2008 at 10:21 a.m. (Suggest removal)
mikell96, yes you are correct the C-130 was the first of those aircraft to enter service....i'm guessing what this statement is referring to is that the C-17 was conceptualized as a replacement to the C-130, although it ended up being a direct replacement for the C-141.
the more notable error in this case is referring to the C-130 as a "cargo jet"; it's not a jet at all, it's a turboprop aircraft.